| |
 |
|
|
| |
| CASE STUDIES |
| |
| Case 9
|
| Updated in July 2006 |
| |
| Absconding Employee |
| |
| After a physical address verification, the case of a candidate is declared discrepant as the
stated house number in the given locality does not exist. The client, however, does not initiate any action on the
candidate already in employment with the company. |
| |
| After a span of about three to four months, the company reverts to AuthBridge to re-open the case
as the employee is now absconding. But in the absence of any further details about the employee's address, the whereabouts
are impossible to unearth. The employee is declared 'Absconding'. |
| |
| |
|
|
|
| |
| |
Back to Case Studies>
|
|
| |
NEXT
>
Resources |
|
| |
|
|
